Few figures in modern Hollywood inspire as much debate as Mel Gibson. Acclaimed for his performances and directing achievements, Gibson is equally known for controversy, outspoken opinions, and public conflicts that have followed him for decades. Recently, renewed attention has focused on a list of actors Gibson has been reported to have had serious disagreements with—stories that blend personal clashes, ideological differences, and long-standing industry tensions.

It is important to approach these accounts carefully. Many of the incidents discussed below are allegations, personal recollections, or reported opinions, not established facts or legal findings. What they collectively reveal is less about individual guilt or innocence and more about the deep cultural and ideological fractures within Hollywood itself.

Winona Ryder: A Dispute That Refuses to Fade

One of the most widely discussed conflicts involves Winona Ryder. Ryder has publicly stated that she experienced deeply offensive remarks from Gibson at a private gathering many years ago, comments she says were directed at her background and at a close friend. She has consistently maintained that the incident caused lasting emotional harm.

Gibson has strongly denied her account, insisting that such remarks were never made and that he attempted to clarify the situation privately in the past. The disagreement has never been legally adjudicated, leaving the public to navigate two irreconcilable narratives. Because of Gibson’s past public controversies, many observers tend to view Ryder’s account as credible, while others emphasize the absence of direct evidence.

What remains clear is that this unresolved dispute has become emblematic of broader conversations about accountability, memory, and trust in Hollywood.

Christopher Walken: An Uneasy Professional Encounter

Gibson has also recounted an unusual and unsettling meeting with Christopher Walken, describing it as one of the strangest professional encounters of his career. According to Gibson, the meeting—intended to discuss a potential film role—took an unexpectedly dark and uncomfortable turn, marked by disturbing subject matter and an atmosphere he described as deeply unsettling.

These remarks reflect Gibson’s personal perception rather than any claim of misconduct. Walken has never publicly addressed or responded to this story, and there is no indication that it affected his career or reputation within the industry. The episode instead highlights how subjective personal impressions can shape professional relationships in Hollywood.

Pedro Pascal: Politics and Performance

Another reported criticism involves Pedro Pascal, one of the most prominent actors of the current era. Gibson has been quoted as expressing frustration with what he views as the increasing overlap between political expression and entertainment. In Pascal’s case, Gibson reportedly felt that public political engagement had become too central to the actor’s image, overshadowing performance itself.

These comments reflect a philosophical disagreement rather than a personal feud. Pascal has not publicly responded, and there is no evidence of direct conflict between the two. The situation underscores an ongoing debate in Hollywood: should actors separate their craft from public advocacy, or is using one’s platform part of artistic responsibility?

Robert De Niro: Art Versus Advocacy

Gibson has also spoken critically of Robert De Niro, an actor he once admired greatly. The tension here centers not on personal interaction, but on differing views about the role of celebrity in public discourse. Gibson has suggested that he believes political commentary has come to dominate De Niro’s public persona, to the detriment of artistic focus.

De Niro, for his part, has been unapologetic about expressing his views publicly. This contrast illustrates a generational and ideological divide within the industry—one where some artists see public advocacy as inseparable from identity, while others view it as a distraction from the work itself.

Alec Baldwin and Industry Accountability

The most sensitive discussion involves Alec Baldwin, in the context of the tragic incident on the set of Rust. Gibson has reportedly expressed frustration over what he perceives as unequal accountability within Hollywood, suggesting that Baldwin benefited from institutional protection following the tragedy.

It is crucial to note that the incident has been subject to extensive legal scrutiny, and responsibility has been addressed through formal investigations rather than opinion. Gibson’s comments appear to reflect his personal feelings about double standards in the industry rather than a legal judgment of Baldwin himself.

Additional Critiques: Hollywood Culture at Large

Beyond specific individuals, Gibson has also voiced criticism of what he views as Hollywood’s performative culture, reportedly including figures such as Tom Hanks and Will Ferrell. These remarks are less about personal hostility and more about Gibson’s belief that the industry prioritizes image management, repetition, and ideological conformity over creative risk and authenticity.

Again, these are subjective opinions, not accusations of wrongdoing.

A Reflection of a Changing Industry

Taken together, these reported conflicts paint a picture of an industry struggling with its own identity. Gibson’s criticisms consistently return to the same themes: the politicization of entertainment, perceived double standards, and a loss of creative independence. Whether one agrees with him or not, his comments resonate with ongoing debates about free expression, accountability, and the evolving role of artists in public life.

Conclusion: Conflict as a Mirror

Mel Gibson’s disputes with fellow actors are not just personal disagreements—they are reflections of deeper cultural divides within Hollywood. They reveal tensions between past and present, restraint and activism, art and ideology. While the truth of individual claims may remain contested, the broader conversation they provoke is undeniably real.

In the end, these stories remind us that Hollywood is not a monolith. It is a complex ecosystem of personalities, beliefs, and pressures—one where clashes are inevitable, and where understanding context matters as much as judgment.